1 Initial Corpus generation & inspection

1.1 Corpus Creation

1.1.1 General steps

  1. Scopus download of documents retrieved from search string from Markard et al. (2012), resulting in ca 2.800 documents. Limited to LANGUAGE=ENGLISH and TYPE=ARTICLE OR CONFERENCE PAPER OR BOOK OR BOOKCHAPTER OR EDITORIAL.
  2. Selecting “seed” publications. 1% most cited total + 1% most cited per year + top3 cited papers from each 2015-2017. Ex-post manual insertion and exclusion (authority based)
  3. Retrieving for each seed 500 publications with most shared references. Again limited to LANGUAGE=ENGLISH and TYPE=ARTICLE OR CONFERENCE PAPER OR BOOK OR BOOKCHAPTER OR EDITORIAL.
  4. Adittional ex. post filtering based on citations recieved and connectivity in bibliographic coupling network (see below)

1.1.2 Final corpus Size

## Number of unique publications in the final corpus:  6184

Generally, 33 x 500 = 16.500 documents downloaded. However, due to an overlap of publications with most shared references to seed papers, final corpus is smaller. Further, number of adittional references per seed added decline. Yet, increase in non-overlapping references indicates the corpus is not saturated yet.

1.1.3 Seed Paper

AU1 PY TI JI TC TC_year
Geels F.W. 2002 Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study Res Policy 1779 254.14
Geels F.W. & Schot J. 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways Res Policy 1390 695.00
Geels F.W. 2004 From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory Res Policy 1126 75.07
Kemp R. et al. 1998 Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 1102 52.48
Unruh G.C. 2000 Understanding carbon lock-in Energy Policy 1026 114.00
Rotmans J. et al. 2001 More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy Foresight 842 105.25
Smith A. et al. 2005 The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions Res Policy 840 60.00
Shove E. 2010 Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change Environ. Plann. A 837 93.00
Hekkert M.P. et al. 2007 Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 811 67.58
Carlsson B. & Stankiewicz R. 1991 On the nature, function and composition of technological systems J Evol Econ 760 42.22
Markard J. et al. 2012 Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects Res Policy 678 96.86
Garud R. & Karnøe P. 2003 Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship Res Policy 675 112.50
Bergek A. et al. 2008 Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis Res Policy 641 641.00
Schot J. & Geels F.W. 2008 Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 566 51.45
Geels F.W. 2005 Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis Technol. Trans. and System Innova.: A Co-Evol. and Socio-Tech. Anal. 503 35.93
Jacobsson S. & Lauber V. 2006 The politics and policy of energy system transformation - Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology Energy Policy 486 37.38
Jacobsson S. & Johnson A. 2000 The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research Energy Policy 468 24.63
Loorbach D. 2010 Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework Governance 449 49.89
Geels F.W. 2010 Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective Res Policy 446 49.56
Smith A. & Raven R. 2012 What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability Res Policy 444 63.43
Markard J. & Truffer B. 2008 Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework Res Policy 443 40.27
Raymond C.M. et al. 2010 Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management J. Environ. Manage. 379 42.11
Coenen L. et al. 2012 Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions Res Policy 342 48.86
Bulkeley H. & Castán Broto V. 2013 Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 292 48.67
Hansen T. & Coenen L. 2015 The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 141 35.25
Geels F.W. et al. 2016 The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014) Res Policy 128 42.67
Sovacool B.K. 2016 How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 125 41.67
Kivimaa P. & Kern F. 2016 Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions Res Policy 109 36.33
Turnheim B. et al. 2015 Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges Global Environ. Change 92 23.00
Vezzoli C. et al. 2015 New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product-Service Systems’ J. Clean. Prod. 89 22.25
Luederitz C. et al. 2017 Learning through evaluation – A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments J. Clean. Prod. 49 24.50
Bauer N. et al. 2017 Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives Global Environ. Change 46 23.00
Patterson J. et al. 2017 Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 45 22.50

1.2 Publications

Note: The following tables refer to the documents in the main corpus.

1.2.1 Top appearing authors, journals, institutions, countries, keywords

Generally, dgr refers to the degree, n to the number of publications. Subscript .f indicates the number is fractionalized (divided by the number of elements per publication)

Authors
Journals
Institutions
countries
Keywords
AU n.f JI n C n.f C_CN n.f DE n
Geels F 33 Res Policy 257 University of Sussex 103 United Kingdom 1084 innovation 347
Nelson R 19 Energy Policy 226 Delft University of Technology 87 United States 967 sustainability 249
Smith A 17 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 194 Lunds Universitet 82 Netherlands 760 climate change 203
Bulkeley H 16 J. Clean. Prod. 171 Wageningen University and Research Centre 79 Sweden 422 governance 160
Hekkert M 14 Ecol. Soc. 161 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 73 Germany 362 transition 109
Foxon T 14 Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 119 Utrecht University 71 Australia 254 transition management 107
Carlsson B 14 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 113 Erasmus University Rotterdam 70 Italy 232 sustainable development 104
Malerba F 13 Procedia CIRP 109 University of Manchester 65 Canada 207 resilience 102
Raven R 13 Sustainability 105 Linköpings universitet 59 France 166 transitions 89
Kemp R 13 Global Environ. Change 90 Chalmers University of Technology 57 Denmark 159 learning 88
Jacobsson S 13 Ind. Corp. Change 87 University of East Anglia 46 Norway 129 renewable energy 88
Shove E 12 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68 Aalborg Universitet 45 Spain 111 innovation policy 82
Berkes F 10 Eur. Plann. Stud. 67 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 42 Finland 110 sustainability transitions 79
Leydesdorff L 10 Technovation 66 Cardiff University 41 Austria 105 strategic niche management 72
Loorbach D 10 Clim. Change 63 UCL 41 Japan 100 product-service systems 69
Brown R 10 J. Evol. Econ. 52 University of Cambridge 40 Switzerland 98 technological change 69
Rohracher H 9 Sci. Public Policy 49 University of Amsterdam 39 China 92 institutions 66
Funk J 9 Futures 47 University of Edinburgh 39 South Korea 76 multi-level perspective 66
Truffer B 9 Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy 45 Stockholms universitet 38 Brazil 60 entrepreneurship 65
Pyka A 9 Reg. Stud. 45 Lancaster University 38 Belgium 54 innovation systems 64

1.3 References cited

Note: The following tables refer to the cited references within the corpus. Number of citation always refers to the citations recieved by the documents in the main corpus.

## Number of unique references cited by the final corpus:  10672  (after removing references cited less than 2 times)

1.3.1 Most cited references, authors, journals

Authors
Journals
References
AU TC.f n.f TC_n SO TC n TC_n SR TC
Geels F 3611 45 66 Research Policy 10739 380 28 Nelson R & Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory… 1127
Nelson R 2218 63 37 Energy Policy 4762 341 14 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 791
Kemp R 1530 37 46 Ecology and Society 2607 163 16 Lundvall B (1993) National Systems of In… 653
Lundvall B 1375 32 35 Administrative Science Quarterly 2032 104 20 Dosi (1982) Research Policy 624
Smith A 1242 30 43 Strategic Management Journal 1878 147 13 Kemp R et al. (1998) Technology Analysis an… 590
Freeman C 1208 34 36 Technological Forecasting and So… 1588 81 20 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 566
Schot J 1112 16 74 Industrial and Corporate Change 1549 115 13 Rip A & Kemp R (1998) In: Rayner, S., Malone… 552
Winter S 1051 30 41 American Economic Review 1469 64 23 Rotmans J et al. (2001) Foresight 522
Schumpeter J 987 14 70 Technology Analysis & Strategic … 1364 42 32 Smith A et al. (2005) Research Policy 424
Rosenberg N 956 24 36 Regional Studies 1301 101 13 Geels F (2004) Research Policy 420
Berkes F 907 42 23 Futures 1295 76 17 Nelson R (1993) National Innovation Sy… 408
Rotmans J 894 27 36 Global Environmental Change 1246 80 16 David P (1985) American Economic Review 402
Folke C 865 27 31 An Evolutionary Theory of Econom… 1127 1 1127 Freeman C (1987) Technology Policy and … 394
Loorbach D 820 21 30 Science 1071 68 16 Schumpeter J (1934) Theory of Economic Dev… 388
Porter M 780 20 35 Technology Analysis and Strategi… 1068 24 44 Arthur B (1989) Economics Journal 388
Edquist C 779 21 31 Organization Science 1031 93 11 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 358
Raven R 778 21 33 NA 1011 148 7 Yin R (1984) Case Study Research: D… 356
Ostrom E 693 28 21 Res. Policy 998 69 14 Rogers E (1996) The Diffusion of Innov… 343
David P 692 23 25 Academy of Management Review 961 66 15 Schumpeter J (1934) Capitalism, Socialism,… 338
Jacobsson S 681 19 40 Journal of Economic Geography 887 53 17 Tushman M & Anderson P (1986) Administrative Science… 334

2 Topic modelling

I by now created some topic modelling. The results are somewhat preliminary, but already worth taking a look at. We ran a LDA on the titles + abstracts of our corpus, aiming at identifying 10 topics (some different numbers of topics to generate shows that 10 result in good results, more topics lead to too much overlap between them)

2.1 Topics by topwords

2.2 LDAViz

HEre you find a nice way of exploring topics via the LDAVIz tool. It dispolays all topics in a 2 dimensional PCA, and also gives a nice visual representation over the topics top-word distribution and overall frequencies of this words in the corpus. The \(\lambda\) parameter regulates the importance-ordering of the topwords. High \(\lambda\) order words by the highest propability to appear in the topic to the lowest (independent of the overall word popularity in the corpus), whle low \(\lambda\) emphasize words which are very specific to the topic, and rarely appear in others.

Play a bit around.

2.3 Topics over time

3 Knowledge Bases: Co-Citation network analysis

Note: This analysis refers the co-citation analysis, where the cited references and not the original publications are the unit of analysis. Here, the strength of the relationship between a reference pair \(m\) and \(n\) (\(s_{m,n}^{coc}\)) is expressed by the number of publications \(C\) which are jointly citing reference \(m\) and \(n\).

\[s_{m,n}^{coc} = \sum_i c_{i,m} c_{i,n}\]

The intuition here is that references which are frequently cited together are likely to share commonalities in theory, topic, methodology, or context. It can be interpreted as a measure of similarity as evaluated by other researchers that decide to jointly cite both references. Because the publication process is time-consuming, co-citation is a backward-looking measure, which is appropriate to map the relationship between core literature of a field.

3.1 Identified knowledge Bases

In order to partition networks into components or clusters, we deploy a community detection technique based on the Lovain Algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008). The Lovain Algorithm is a heuristic method that attempts to optimize the modularity of communities within a network by maximizing within- and minimizing between-community connectivity.

We identify the following communities = knowledge bases

It is not the main focus of this exercise, but still informative to see which historical knowledge the fields draws from.

We identify 4 communities of avrying size (note: I just gave it some ad-hoc names to work with for now. Should be revised). We on first glance see that all share a somewhat similar internal density (meaning the references in the corresponding community are stronger connected with each others), except of community 3, which is more densely connected.

3.2 Most central references, authors, journals per knowledge base

Lets do a first attempt to categorize them:

Authors
Journals
References
AU dgr.f SO dgr SR dgr
Community 1
Nelson R 101 Research Policy 138 Nelson R & Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory… 58
Winter S 92 Administrative Science Quarterly 88 Dosi (1982) Research Policy 32
Dosi G 71 Strategic Management Journal 59 Tushman M & Anderson P (1986) Administrative Science… 23
Tushman M 49 An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 58 Henderson R & Clark K (1990) Administrative Science… 23
Rosenberg N 41 American Economic Review 44 David P (1985) American Economic Review 20
Schumpeter J 41 Industrial and Corporate Change 39 Schumpeter J (1934) Theory of Economic Dev… 18
Anderson P 38 Organization Science 26 Arthur B (1989) Economics Journal 17
Utterback J 36 Economic Journal 23 Abernathy & Utterback (1978) Technology Review 16
Clark K 36 Academy of Management Review 21 Schumpeter J (1934) Capitalism, Socialism,… 16
Levinthal D 30 Journal of Economic Literature 19 Utterback J (1994) Mastering the Dynamics… 15
Community 2
Geels F 191 Research Policy 203 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 36
Kemp R 131 Energy Policy 88 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 28
Schot J 112 Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 48 Kemp R et al. (1998) Technology Analysis an… 26
Smith A 93 Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 38 Rip A & Kemp R (1998) In: Rayner, S., Malone… 25
Rotmans J 73 Futures 25 Rotmans J et al. (2001) Foresight 23
Raven R 62 In: Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds), Human … 25 Smith A et al. (2005) Research Policy 21
Truffer B 55 Foresight 24 Geels F (2004) Research Policy 18
Loorbach D 51 Technological Forecasting and Social Change 21 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 16
Hoogma R 48 Policy Sciences 21 Shove E & Walker G (2007) Environment and Planni… 13
Berkhout F 38 Environment and Planning A 19 Smith A et al. (2010) Research Policy 12
Community 3
Boschma R 39 Research Policy 51 Lundvall B (1993) National Systems of In… 21
Jacobsson S 37 Regional Studies 43 Freeman C (1987) Technology Policy and … 14
Lundvall B 37 Journal of Economic Geography 38 Carlsson B & Stankiewicz R (1991) Journal of Evolutionar… 12
Carlsson B 34 Economic Geography 21 Nelson R (1993) National Innovation Sy… 12
Cooke P 32 National Systems of Innovation. 21 Porter M (1990) The Competitive Advant… 10
Asheim B 26 Progress in Human Geography 19 Bathelt H et al. (2004) Progress in Human Geog… 9
Maskell P 24 The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 16 Boschma R (2005) Regional Studies 8
Edquist C 24 Technology Policy and Economic Performance… 14 Hekkert M et al. (2007) Technological Forecast… 8
Freeman C 23 Technological Forecasting and Social Change 14 Bergek A et al. (2008) Research Policy 8
Malmberg A 22 Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13 Saxenian A (1996) Regional Advantage: Cu… 8
Community 4
Folke C 139 Ecology and Society 89 Folke C et al. (2005) Annual Review of Envir… 18
Olsson P 75 Global Environmental Change 33 Gunderson L & Holling C (2002) Panarchy: Understandin… 11
Berkes F 71 Science 27 Olsson P et al. (2006) Ecology and Society 9
Holling C 57 Annual Review of Environment and Resources 24 Walker B et al. (2004) Ecology and Society 9
Carpenter S 54 Ecosystems 11 Folke C (2006) Global Environmental C… 8
Walker B 46 Journal of Environmental Management 11 Berkes F et al. (2003) Navigating Nature’s Dy… 8
Gunderson L 37 Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in… 11 Folke C et al. (2010) Ecology and Society 8
Ostrom E 34 Nature 11 Berkes F (2009) Journal of Environment… 7
Hahn T 31 Ambio 10 Olsson P et al. (2004) Environmental Management 6
Armitage D 22 Environmental Management 8 Berkes F & Folke C (1998) Linking social and eco… 6

3.3 Development over time

We see number of citations towards the STS knowledge base to sharply increase post-2000. Interestingly, citations to the evolutionary economics and industry-dynamics related knowledge base to completely vanish.

4 Research Areas: Bibliographic coupling analysis

This is arguably the most interesting part. Here, we identify the literature’s current knowledge frontier by carrying out a bibliographic coupling analysis of the publications in our corpus. This measure uses bibliographical information of publications to establish a similarity relationship between them. This **coupling-strength} between publications is determined by the number of commonly cited references they share, assuming a common pool of references to indicate similarity in context, methods, or theory. Formally, the strength of the relationship between a publication pair \(i\) and \(j\) (\(s_{i,j}^{bib}\)) is expressed by the number of commonly cited references.

\[ s_{i,j}^{bib} = \sum_m c_{i,m} c_{j,m} \]

Since our corpus contains publications which differ strongly in terms of the number of cited references, we normalize the coupling strength by the Jaccard similarity coefficient. Here, we weight the intercept of two publications’ bibliography (shared refeences) by their union (number of all references cited by either \(i\) or \(j\)). It is bounded between zero and one, where one indicates the two publications to have an identical bibliography, and zero that they do not share any cited reference. Thereby, we prevent publications from having high coupling strength due to a large bibliography (e.g., literature surveys).

\[ S_{i,j}^{jac-bib} =\frac{C(i \cap j)}{C(i \cup j)} = \frac{s_{i,j}^{bib}}{c_i + c_j - s_{i,j}^{bib}} \]

More recent articles have a higher pool of possible references to co-cite to, hence they are more likely to be coupled. Consequently, bibliographic coupling represents a forward looking measure, and the method of choice to identify the current knowledge frontier at the point of analysis.

4.1 Identified research areas

To identify communities in the field’s knowledge frontier (labeled research areas) we again use the Lovain Algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008). We identify the following communities = research areas

We on first glance see that RA 1&2 are substantially larger than the rest.

4.2 Characterizing the research areas

Now its time to describe them. In the following, I provide some statistics statistics per community which I find helpful to do so:

4.2.1 Most central journals, authors, institutions

Authors
Journals
Institutions
Keywords
Most cited References
AU dgr.f JI dgr C dgr.f DE dgr CR n
Community 1
Nelson R 850 Res Policy 5032 University of Sussex 1371 innovation 4417 Nelson R & Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 480
Malerba F 842 Ind. Corp. Change 2317 Lunds Universitet 1255 technological change 1146 Dosi G (1982) Research Policy 248
Leydesdorff L 679 Technovation 1637 University of Manchester 1056 entrepreneurship 967 Cohen W & Levinthal D (1990) Administrative Science Quarterly 175
Dosi G 626 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1347 Utrecht University 961 innovation systems 938 Tushman M & Anderson P (1986) Administrative Science Quarterly 158
Verspagen B 455 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 930 Università Bocconi 915 innovation policy 885 Lundvall B (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a … 150
Fagerberg J 406 J. Evol. Econ. 831 Columbia University in the City of New York 833 learning 793 Porter M (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations 145
Orsenigo L 380 Strategic Manage J 792 Aalborg Universitet 718 networks 732 Henderson R & Clark K (1990) Administrative Science Quarterly 139
Carlsson B 375 Eur. Plann. Stud. 743 University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School 691 technology 641 Dosi G (1988) Journal of Economic Literature 134
Garud R 344 Reg. Stud. 665 University of Cambridge 576 evolution 557 Lundvall B (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory 125
Lundvall B 329 Energy Policy 663 Copenhagen Business School 564 evolutionary economics 510 Pavitt K (1984) Research Policy 125
Community 2
Geels F 1608 Energy Policy 2698 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 2582 sustainability 2239 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 288
Raven R 1209 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2545 University of Sussex 2247 multi-level perspective 1993 Rotmans J et al. (2001) Foresight 251
Smith A 1014 Res Policy 2087 Erasmus University Rotterdam 1138 transition management 1902 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 211
Truffer B 916 Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 1848 Utrecht University 1131 transitions 1810 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 205
Hekkert M 772 J. Clean. Prod. 1638 Delft University of Technology 1101 transition 1785 Smith A et al. (2005) Research Policy 169
Kemp R 583 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 1486 Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science… 1040 sustainability transitions 1706 Rip A & Kemp R (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change 165
Foxon T 517 Global Environ. Change 612 Wageningen University and Research Centre 936 strategic niche management 1534 Kemp R et al. (1998) Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 154
Markard J 501 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 582 University of East Anglia 878 innovation 1506 Geels F (2004) Research Policy 148
Kern F 492 Sustainability 519 Lunds Universitet 790 governance 1052 Geels F (2002) Res. Policy 129
Rotmans J 474 Futures 484 University of Leeds 744 socio-technical transitions 984 Geels F (2005) Technological Transitions and System Innov… 106
Community 3
Folke C 241 Ecol. Soc. 1142 Stockholms universitet 591 resilience 789 Folke C et al. (2005) Annual Review of Environment and Resources 94
Olsson P 173 Global Environ. Change 260 Arizona State University 174 governance 409 Walker B et al. (2004) Ecology and Society 66
Berkes F 151 J. Environ. Manage. 103 James Cook University, Australia 173 adaptive governance 345 Olsson P et al. (2006) Ecology and Society 62
Plummer R 119 Environ. Educ. Res. 96 University of Manitoba 166 social-ecological systems 345 Gunderson L & Holling C (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in… 61
Fazey I 103 Environ. Manage. 77 Wageningen University and Research Centre 137 adaptive management 286 Berkes F et al. (2000) Ecological Applications 60
Armitage D 94 Sustainability 74 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Res… 122 climate change 281 Olsson P et al. (2004) Environmental Management 57
Schultz L 90 Local Environ. 71 Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien 121 adaptive capacity 253 Folke C (2006) Global Environmental Change 55
Gunderson L 87 Environ. Sci. Policy 68 Brock University 119 transformation 244 Folke C et al. (2010) Ecology and Society 52
Reed M 86 Environ. Conserv. 68 University of Aberdeen 119 sustainability 234 Berkes F (2009) Journal of Environmental Management 51
Bulkeley H 77 Soc. Nat. Res. 68 University of Waterloo 118 social learning 227 Kates R et al. (2001) Science 51
Community 4
Shove E 129 J. Consum. Cult. 161 RMIT University 178 practice theory 267 Reckwitz A (2002) European Journal of Social Theory 85
Strengers Y 109 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 132 Lancaster University 173 sustainable consumption 249 Warde A (2005) Journal of Consumer Culture 66
Gram-Hanssen K 96 J. Clean. Prod. 88 University of Manchester 160 social practices 179 Shove E (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The … 48
Halkier B 78 Build Res Inf 79 Aalborg Universitet 119 social practice theory 164 Schatzki T (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approa… 44
Maller C 77 Environ. Plann. A 57 University of East Anglia 111 consumption 153 Shove E (2010) Environment and Planning A 43
Warde A 70 Sustainable Practices: Soc. Theory and Cli… 53 Roskilde University 80 everyday life 118 Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society 42
Hargreaves T 61 Energy Policy 52 Wageningen University and Research Centre 69 climate change 98 Shove E & Pantzar M (2005) Journal of Consumer Culture 35
Spaargaren G 49 Global Environ. Change 45 Keele University 55 practices 94 Schatzki T (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Ac… 32
Martens L 47 Geoforum 44 University of Exeter 54 social practice 93 Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of th… 27
Keller M 42 J. Transp. Geogr. 33 Delft University of Technology 49 sustainability 72 Ajzen I (1991) Organizational Behavior and Human Decision… 25
Community 5
Riahi K 334 Clim. Change 339 International Institute for Applied System… 498 climate change 249 Moss R et al. (2010) Nature 58
Kriegler E 258 Global Environ. Change 219 Potsdam Institut fur Klimafolgenforschung 429 scenarios 121 Wigley T et al. (1996) Nature 34
van Vuuren D 241 Environ.Res.Lett. 113 PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment A… 388 mitigation 86 Moss R (2010) Nature 27
Edmonds J 191 Nat. Clim. Change 75 Utrecht University 386 shared socioeconomic pathways 83 O’Neill B et al. (2014) Clim. Change 26
Calvin K 187 Energy Policy 62 National Center for Atmospheric Research 267 climate policy 72 Meinshausen M et al. (2011) Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24
Fujimori S 178 Energy Econ. 51 National Institute for Environmental Studi… 247 integrated assessment 69 Kriegler E et al. (2014) Clim. Change 22
O’Neill B 159 Geoscientific Model Dev. 44 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 222 climate change mitigation 69 Nordhaus W (1994) Managing the Global Commons: The Economics… 21
Havlik P 147 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 40 Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 167 adaptation 61 Cline W (1992) The Economics of Global Warming 18
Krey V 143 Environ. Model. Softw. 36 Wageningen University and Research Centre 156 ssp 45 Schneider S & Goulder L (1997) Nature 18
Ebi K 142 Environ. Model. Assess. 27 Technische Universitat Graz 146 integrated assessment models 43 Grubb M (1997) Energy Policy 16
Community 6
Durugbo C 112 J. Clean. Prod. 597 Cranfield University 279 product-service systems 430 Mont O (2002) Journal of Cleaner Production 50
Sakao T 103 Int J Prod Res 162 Linköpings universitet 152 sustainability 304 Tukker A (2004) Business Strategy and the Environment 45
Ceschin F 82 CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 142 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 113 product-service system 268 Aurich J et al. (2006) Journal of Cleaner Production 35
Ming X 79 J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 129 Luleå tekniska Universitet 107 servitization 260 Tukker A & Tischner U (2006) Journal of Cleaner Production 34
Wu Z 79 Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106 Seoul National University 104 pss 201 Goedkoop M et al. (1999) Product Service Systems, Ecological and Ec… 33
Tiwari A 75 Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 67 Aalto University 94 product service systems 161 Roy R (2000) Futures 29
Cook M 72 Ind. Mark. Manage. 64 Università degli Studi di Bergamo 83 product-service system (pss) 121 Morelli N (2006) Journal of Cleaner Production 26
Wang L 70 Serv. Bus. 58 Brunel University London 69 product service system 111 Alonso-Rasgado T et al. (2004) Journal of Engineering Design 25
Park Y 64 Comput Ind 56 Loughborough University 66 design 100 Manzini E & Vezzoli C (2003) Journal of Cleaner Production 25
Evans S 62 J. Eng. Des. 55 Pohang University of Science and Technology 64 service 95 Oliva R & Kallenberg R (2003) International Journal of Service Industry … 25

Ok, my very condensed interpretation:

  • com1: IS, National & sectoral, evolutionary economics, industrial dynamics
  • com2: The core of sustainability transitions. Results very similar to the corresponding community in Rakas & Hain (2018)
  • com3: Climate change adaption, resilience, governance (not an expert in this literature)
  • com4: Sustainable consumption, more behavorial, sociology
  • com5: Real enviromental science
  • com6: Product-Service systems (interesting concept, honestly never heard of till now)

One small sidenote: There is no real economics community to be found.

4.2.2 Most central publications per research area

Brief reminder: Centrality in a bibliographic coupling network == representativeness != importance

Therefore, the central articles should be appropriate to characterize the kind of work done in the community, but are not necessarily the most important or influencial ones.

AU PY TI JI dgr
Community 1
Fagerberg J & Sapprasert K 2011 National innovation systems: The emergence of a new approach Sci. Public Policy 71.794
Malerba F & Mani S 2009 Sectoral systems of innovation and production in developing countries: An introduction Sectoral Syst. of Innov. and Prod. in Dev…. 67.183
Simmie J 2002 Knowledge spillovers and reasons for the concentration of innovative SMEs Urban Stud. 61.315
Lee J & Park C 2006 Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea Technovation 58.775
Edquist C & Hommen L 1999 Systems of innovation: Theory and policy for the demand side Technol. Soc. 58.655
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B 2005 Inter-firm collaboration and competitive pressures: SME footwear clusters in Nigeria Int. J. Technol. Globalisation 58.523
Midttun A 2007 Corporate responsibility from a resource and knowledge perspective Towards a dynamic reinterpretation of C(S)R: Are corporate responsibility and in… Corp. Gov. 58.232
Malerba F & Nelson R 2011 Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries Ind. Corp. Change 57.713
Landstrom H et al. 2015 Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: one or two fields of research? Int. Entrep. Manage. J. 57.393
Hall J & Kerr R 2003 Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: The emergence of fuel cell technology J. Clean. Prod. 57.250
Community 2
Geels F 2005 Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71.905
Meelen T & Farla J 2013 Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 68.628
Genus A & Coles A 2008 Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions Res Policy 67.036
Murphy J & Smith A 2013 Understanding transition-periphery dynamics: Renewable energy in the highlands and Islands of Scotland Environ. Plann. A 66.812
Fuenfschilling L & Truffer B 2014 The structuration of socio-technical regimes - Conceptual foundations from institutional theory Res Policy 65.553
Ingram J 2015 Framing niche-regime linkage as adaptation: An analysis of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe J. Rural Stud. 65.059
Ingram J et al. 2015 Interactions between Niche and Regime: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 64.900
Markard J & Truffer B 2008 Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework Res Policy 64.774
Mazur C et al. 2015 Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 64.578
Lachman D 2013 A survey and review of approaches to study transitions Energy Policy 63.913
Community 3
Berkes F 2017 Environmental governance for the anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning Sustainability 24.531
Mitchell M et al. 2014 Applying Resilience Thinking to Natural Resource Management through a "“Planning-By-Doing”" Framework Soc. Nat. Res. 23.306
Chaffin B et al. 2014 A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions Ecol. Soc. 21.357
Plummer R 2013 Can adaptive comanagement help to address the challenges of climate change adaptation? Ecol. Soc. 19.907
Plummer R 2010 Social-ecological resilience and environmental education: Synopsis, application, implications Environ. Educ. Res. 19.709
Gunderson L et al. 2006 Water RATs (resilience, adaptability, and transformability) in lake and wetland social-ecological systems Ecol. Soc. 19.401
Hahn T & Nykvist B 2017 Are adaptations self-organized, autonomous, and harmonious? Assessing the social–ecological resilience literature Ecol. Soc. 18.954
Cumming G et al. 2013 Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes Landsc. Ecol. 18.327
Ros-Tonen M et al. 2014 From co-management to landscape governance: Whither Ghana’s modified taungya system? Forests 18.162
Schultz L & Lundholm C 2010 Learning for resilience? exploring learning opportunities in biosphere reserves Environ. Educ. Res. 17.604
Community 4
Gram-Hanssen K 2011 Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption J. Consum. Cult. 21.836
Shove E & Spurling N 2013 Sustainable practices: Social theory and climate change Sustainable Practices: Soc. Theory and Cli… 20.738
Maller C 2015 Understanding health through social practices: Performance and materiality in everyday life Sociol. Health Illn. 20.680
Foulds C et al. 2013 Investigating the performance of everyday domestic practices using building monitoring Build Res Inf 19.024
Hargreaves T 2011 Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change J. Consum. Cult. 19.000
Mylan J 2015 Understanding the diffusion of Sustainable Product-Service Systems: Insights from the sociology of consumption and practice theory J. Clean. Prod. 18.989
Welch D & Warde A 2014 Theories of practice and sustainable consumption Handb. of Res. on Sustain. Consum. 18.840
Galvin R & Sunikka-Blank M 2016 Schatzkian practice theory and energy consumption research: Time for some philosophical spring cleaning? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 18.245
Jaeger-Erben M & Offenberger U 2014 A practice theory approach to sustainable consumption GAIA 18.234
Navari C 2011 The concept of practice in the English School Eur. J. Int. Relat. 17.926
Community 5
van Vuuren D et al. 2014 A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: Scenario matrix architecture Clim. Change 19.448
Kriegler E et al. 2014 A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared climate policy assumptions Clim. Change 18.478
Riahi K et al. 2017 The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview Global Environ. Change 17.798
van Vuuren D et al. 2017 The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change Global Environ. Change 17.383
Calvin K et al. 2017 The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality Global Environ. Change 17.099
Ebi K 2013 Health in the new scenarios for climate change research Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16.905
Schweizer V & O’Neill B 2014 Systematic construction of global socioeconomic pathways using internally consistent element combinations Clim. Change 16.547
O’Neill B et al. 2016 The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 Geoscientific Model Dev. 16.336
van Vuuren D et al. 2011 A special issue on the RCPs Clim. Change 15.758
Ebi K et al. 2014 A new scenario framework for climate change research: Background, process, and future directions Clim. Change 15.680
Community 6
Geum Y & Park Y 2011 Designing the sustainable product-service integration: A product-service blueprint approach J. Clean. Prod. 29.634
Aurich J et al. 2009 Configuration of product-service systems J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 27.351
Sakao T et al. 2013 Uncovering benefits and risks of integrated product service offerings - Using a case of technology encapsulation J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 25.728
Long H et al. 2013 Product service system configuration based on support vector machine considering customer perception Int J Prod Res 25.361
Beuren F et al. 2013 Product-service systems: A literature review on integrated products and services J. Clean. Prod. 25.258
Medini K & Boucher X 2016 Configuration of Product-Service Systems value networks – Evidence from an innovative sector for sludge treatment CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 25.184
Wang P et al. 2011 Status review and research strategies on product-service systems Int J Prod Res 24.997
Durugbo C et al. 2011 A review of information flow diagrammatic models for product-service systems Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24.951
Zhu Q et al. 2011 Implementing an industrial product-service system for CNC machine tool Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24.903
Park H & Yoon J 2013 A chance discovery-based approach for new product–service system (PSS) concepts Serv. Bus. 24.756

4.3 Publications over time

4.4 Connectivity between the research areas

Ok, just to get a first glance, should not be overinterpreted. We see sustainability transition to be the most central community (not surprising, keeping in mind how the corpus is generated). More interestingly, it appears to be strongly connected to IS, climate change adaption and sustainable consumption literature, less so to enviromental science and PSS.

4.5 Zooming in the systainability transitions community

In the first scan it can clearly be seen, that the core of the sustainability transitions community resides in com2. So, lets zoom in a bit there and look at its internal structure. So, I did a second round of community detection inside com2 to identify the sub-communities within sustainability transitions. Lets see what we find…

We here find 4 sub-communities of rather equal size. Lets characterize them…

4.5.1 Most central journals, authors, institutions

Authors
Journals
Institutions
Keywords
Most cited References
AU dgr.f JI dgr C dgr.f DE dgr CR n
Community 1
Smith A 228 Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 514 University of Sussex 522 sustainability transitions 590 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 106
Seyfang G 196 J. Clean. Prod. 320 University of East Anglia 265 sustainability 399 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 84
Raven R 166 Energy Policy 316 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 242 transitions 391 Smith A et al. (2005) Research Policy 69
Geels F 146 Res Policy 288 Utrecht University 220 transition 376 Smith A et al. (2010) Research Policy 59
Longhurst N 144 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 195 University of Manchester 177 multi-level perspective 255 Geels F (2002) Res. Policy 57
Kern F 117 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 180 University of Leeds 171 innovation 249 Geels F (2004) Research Policy 51
Bulkeley H 108 Environ. Plann. A 171 University of Durham 155 governance 248 Seyfang G & Smith A (2007) Environmental Politics 49
Hargreaves T 90 Global Environ. Change 162 Linköpings universitet 137 climate change 237 Shove E & Walker G (2007) Environment and Planning A 48
Rohracher H 89 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 145 Wageningen University and Research Centre 130 energy 214 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Res. Policy 46
Gibbs D 84 Urban Stud. 133 UCL 119 strategic niche management 212 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 42
Community 2
Geels F 793 Res Policy 419 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 1076 multi-level perspective 567 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 103
Raven R 386 Energy Policy 399 University of Sussex 316 strategic niche management 441 Kemp R et al. (1998) Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 84
Smith A 185 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 362 University of Twente 228 transition 262 Rip A & Kemp R (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change 79
Schot J 182 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 319 Wageningen University and Research Centre 203 sustainability 253 Schot J et al. (1994) Futures 58
Kemp R 181 Technol. Soc. 185 University of Amsterdam 134 system innovation 234 Geels F (2004) Research Policy 46
Verbong G 152 J. Clean. Prod. 151 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 128 co-evolution 231 Kemp R (1994) Futures 45
Truffer B 137 Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 131 University of Cambridge 114 transition management 194 Hoogma R et al. (2002) Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: T… 41
Berkhout F 104 Syst. Innov. and the Transit. to Sustainab… 122 Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science… 106 innovation 188 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 41
Elzen B 89 Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 109 Erasmus University Rotterdam 105 transitions 139 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 39
Lovell H 81 Technovation 79 Imperial College London 103 biomass 129 Nelson R & Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 39
Community 3
Rotmans J 198 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 217 Erasmus University Rotterdam 318 transition management 452 Rotmans J et al. (2001) Foresight 179
Brown R 165 J. Clean. Prod. 184 Delft University of Technology 243 transitions 283 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 45
Loorbach D 150 Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 112 Monash University 193 sustainability 244 Geels F & Schot J (2007) Research Policy 42
Kemp R 122 Futures 103 Wageningen University and Research Centre 116 governance 186 Smith A et al. (2005) Research Policy 39
Whitmarsh L 95 Energy Policy 90 University of Sussex 101 sustainable development 160 Rip A & Kemp R (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change 35
Farrelly M 88 Sustainability 85 University of East Anglia 72 transition 157 Loorbach D (2010) Governance 30
Bergman N 85 Policy Sci. 76 Tellus Institute 69 innovation 149 Geels F (2005) Technological Transitions and System Innov… 28
Schilperoord M 74 Ecol. Soc. 70 UNU-MERIT 68 socio-technical transitions 97 Loorbach D (2007) Transition Management: New Mode of Governa… 28
Meadowcroft J 63 Res Policy 64 University of Oxford 67 sustainability transitions 85 Shove E & Walker G (2007) Environment and Planning A 24
Smith A 60 Global Environ. Change 61 Carleton University 63 urban water 81 Kern F & Smith A (2008) Energy Policy 23
Community 4
Hekkert M 338 Energy Policy 489 Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science… 289 technological innovation systems 270 Unruh G (2000) Energy Policy 106
Truffer B 226 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 424 Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Devel… 265 technological innovation system 266 Jacobsson S & Johnson A (2000) Energy Policy 86
Jacobsson S 198 Res Policy 219 Utrecht University 255 innovation 154 Jacobsson S & Lauber V (2006) Energy Policy 69
Markard J 165 Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 179 Chalmers University of Technology 231 sustainability 152 Jacobsson S & Bergek A (2004) Industrial and Corporate Change 67
Suurs R 124 Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 175 Lunds Universitet 179 innovation system 146 Geels F (2002) Research Policy 56
Coenen L 123 J. Clean. Prod. 104 Linköpings universitet 136 innovation policy 144 Bergek A et al. (2008) Research Policy 53
Bergek A 114 Eur. Plann. Stud. 88 University of Sussex 119 renewable energy 137 Hekkert M et al. (2007) Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47
Negro S 105 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 54 Studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning 103 innovation systems 126 Markard J & Truffer B (2008) Research Policy 44
Foxon T 85 Sustainability 33 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 99 policy 108 Carlsson B & Stankiewicz R (1991) Journal of Evolutionary Economics 42
Hillman K 75 Energy 30 University of Leeds 94 biofuels 92 Bergek A et al. (2008) Res. Policy 39

For me it seems as if there are differences, but I guess one has to look closer. Is that helpful?

4.5.2 Most central publications per research area

AU PY TI JI dgr
Community 1
Ingram J 2015 Framing niche-regime linkage as adaptation: An analysis of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe J. Rural Stud. 31.794
Hargreaves T et al. 2013 Up, down, round and round: Connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability Environ. Plann. A 31.126
Fuenfschilling L & Truffer B 2014 The structuration of socio-technical regimes - Conceptual foundations from institutional theory Res Policy 29.075
Ingram J et al. 2015 Interactions between Niche and Regime: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 28.234
Lachman D 2013 A survey and review of approaches to study transitions Energy Policy 28.166
Raven R et al. 2016 The politics of innovation spaces for low-carbon energy: Introduction to the special issue Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 27.789
Mattes J et al. 2015 Energy transitions in small-scale regions - What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective Energy Policy 26.850
Seyfang G et al. 2010 Energy and communities in transition - Towards a new research agenda on agency and civil society in sustainability transitions Work. Pap. Cent. Soc. Econ. Res. Global En… 26.652
Pesch U 2015 Tracing discursive space: Agency and change in sustainability transitions Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 26.338
Ravena R et al. 2012 Space and scale in socio-Technical transitions Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 26.280
Community 2
Geels F 2004 Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis Syst. Innov. and the Transit. to Sustainab… 46.710
Geels F 2005 Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 40.023
Raven R 2006 Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime Res Policy 39.380
Raven R 2007 Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969-2003) Energy Policy 38.071
Geels F & Schot J 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways Res Policy 37.118
Geels F 2006 Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850-1930) Technol. Soc. 37.012
Geels F & Kemp R 2006 Transitions, Transformations, and Reproduction: Dynamics in Socio-Technical Systems Flex. and Stab. in the Innov. Econ. 36.264
Simmie J et al. 2014 New technological path creation: evidence from the British and German wind energy industries J. Evol. Econ. 36.065
Geels F 2007 Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930-1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 34.661
Geels F & Kemp R 2007 Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies Technol. Soc. 34.260
Community 3
Brunori G et al. 2012 On the New Social Relations around and beyond Food. Analysing Consumers’ Role and Action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups) Sociol. Ruralis 22.662
Schilperoord M et al. 2008 Modelling societal transitions with agent transformation Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 22.120
Pekkarinen S et al. 2011 Clashes as potential for innovation in public service sector reform Int. J. Public Sect. Manage. 22.013
van Staveren M et al. 2014 Let’s bring in the floods: de-poldering in the Netherlands as a strategy for long-term delta survival? Water Int. 19.629
Kemp R 2010 The Dutch energy transition approach Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 19.256
De Haan F et al. 2014 The needs of society: A new understanding of transitions, sustainability and liveability Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 19.029
Smith A & Stirling A 2010 The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions Ecol. Soc. 18.736
Bergman N et al. 2008 Modelling socio-technical transition patterns and pathways JASSS 18.733
Ortiz W et al. 2012 Introducing modern energy services into developing countries: The role of local community socio-economic structures Sustainability 18.456
Kemp R et al. 2011 Transition management as a model for sustainable mobility Eur. Transp. Trasporti Eur. 18.416
Community 4
Lovio R & Kivimaa P 2012 Comparing Alternative Path Creation Frameworks in the Context of Emerging Biofuel Fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland Eur. Plann. Stud. 21.184
Edsand H 2017 Identifying barriers to wind energy diffusion in Colombia: A function analysis of the technological innovation system and the wider context Technol. Soc. 21.181
Vidican G et al. 2012 An empirical examination of the development of a solar innovation system in the United Arab Emirates Energy Sustainable Dev. 20.665
van Alphen K et al. 2009 The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system Energy Policy 20.251
Hellsmark H & Jacobsson S 2009 Opportunities for and limits to Academics as System builders-The case of realizing the potential of gasified biomass in Austria Energy Policy 20.235
Jacobsson S & Bergek A 2011 Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research Environmental Innovation and Societal Tran… 20.005
Markard J & Truffer B 2008 Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework Res Policy 19.991
Meelen T & Farla J 2013 Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 19.395
Hillman K et al. 2008 Cumulative causation in biofuels development: A critical comparison of the Netherlands and Sweden Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 18.928
Dewald U & Truffer B 2011 Market formation in technological innovation systems-diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany Ind. Innov. 18.450

I know to little about the internal dynamics in the field, but hope that makes somewhat sense…

4.5.3 Internal network

4.5.3.1 Overall

Finally, we can take a look at the most central publications (tob 50) in the community via a network plot.

4.5.3.2 Per sub-community

To go a bit more in detal, I also provide the network of the top-100 most central publications per community. I here tried out an interactive visualization. You can zoom in and out, and the names of the papers are revealed when you click them. Should be a bit less overwhelming that way, and should encourage own exploration. Lets see if you like it.

5 2-Mode dynamics

still to-do